Sir Ridley Scott’s adaptation of the biblical Book of Exodus is very much done in the
spirit of the Golden Age of Cinema; where thousands upon thousands of extras
inhabited gigantic setpieces which are set in even gigantic-er landscapes…topped
off with big-name actors, rousing scores, and jaw-dropping visuals. That is the
leap-off point of Scott’s version of the story, EXODUS: GODS AND KINGS.
Moses (Christian Bale) is raised as a brother alongside the
future Pharaoh Ramses (Joel Edgerton) in ancient Egypt. When Moses learns of
his true lineage, he rises up against Ramses in an attempt to free the 400,000
Hebrew slaves from Egypt.
Everything about EXODUS: GODS AND KINGS is done on a HUGE scale. Massive cities and sprawling
landscapes are always front and center, along with the behemoth task of getting
tens of thousands of people out of bondage and across tens of thousands of
miles of desert to their homeland. With such a big canvas to work from, the
human focus of GODS AND KINGS naturally goes to Moses. This is truly his story
as his faith is constantly put to the test as he tries to pull off a task he
himself is not sure can be done.
While a lot of time is spent with Moses and his struggles to
believe, Ridley Scott winds up making a very dull film. Despite how much is
going on with Moses, his step-brother, his real family, and the mystical
elements surrounding and attacking everything, GODS AND KINGS doesn’t have much
of a heartbeat to it and no real vision. Other than some startling visuals,
Scott doesn’t put any personal touch on the characters or the story, and the
result is very underwhelming.
While the characters get lost and the story slogs along,
Scott puts a lot of effort in keeping the mystical elements grounded. The messages
from God to Moses come via a creepy little boy who vanishes at will, and some
of the deadly plagues are actually grounded in realism; a practical reason is
given for the fantastical happenings as Scott doesn’t seem interested in just
holy magic. For the most part it works, but Scott doesn’t fully commit to the
idea. Only some of the plagues get the grounded treatment, while the others
just seem to happen on their own. One gets the feeling that there are some
things cut out of the film for time (more on that later), because the imbalance
is very up-front.
While Scott is creating a head-scratching ho-hummer, he
still manages to display one of the most jaw-dropping and visually stunning
films of his career. Landscapes and cityscapes are breathtaking, and he deadly
plagues, especially the locusts and the frogs…are chillingly creepy. Scott’s
stark photography and eye for framing the perfect shot is always on display,
and there is never a moment when GODS AND KINGS is visually dull.
Acting is far from god-like. Christian Bale seems confused
as to when to keep his odd accent, and Joel Edgerton seems lost in all the spectacle.
Aaron Paul (TV’s BREAKING BAD) also gets lost in it all, and Sir Ben Kingsley
only shows up to tell everyone what’s going on. Sigourney Weaver pops in a few
times to speak about 12 words total (again, feeling like a victim of the
cutting room), and John Turturro just can’t be taken seriously as an Egyptian
Pharaoh.
After a rousing and incredible parting of the Red Sea
sequence towards the finale, GODS AND KINGS slogs down into a very
anti-climatic wrap. The story takes several time-jumps and blows by decades of
happenings, and only briefly touches upon some of the more well-known aspects
of the story. It does feel like a lot of scenes are missing and that a complete
version of the film has yet to be seen, but until then this is all we can react
to. GODS AND KINGS winds up being a frustrating watch because it is visually
arresting, but lacks the substance to make it worthwhile. There is no mighty
message from the heavens to be seen here.
BOTTOM LINE: Fuck it
No comments:
Post a Comment
A few rules:
1. Personal attacks not tolerated.
2. Haters welcome, if you can justify it.
3. Swearing is goddamn OK.